Would You Take The Shot?

by Charlie

Would you take the shot?

I was driving to a friend’s house the other day when I entered the motorway and everything ground to a halt. We crawled along for a few miles and before long the source of the trouble became apparent.

A sporty looking saloon – it was impossible to tell what it was before the crash – had spun out, swiped a lorry and ended up half way through the barrier. The police, fire and ambulance service were all in attendance and there was a blur of fluorescent jackets swarming around the vehicles.

Without warning the car’s fuel tank exploded. I don’t mean that it caught fire and popped a bit; it actually exploded – fire ball and all. I had no idea that this could actually happen in real life. I thought exploding fuel tanks only happened in Hollywood. In my excitement I reached into the back seat, grabbed my camera, switched it on, raised it to my face and zoomed in. Then something odd happened. I started to squeeze the shutter release and as I did so, a flood of guilt washed through me and I froze. As if someone else was controlling me, I put the camera down on the passenger seat, leant back in my chair and let out a long sigh. I felt appalled with myself. Some poor fellow might have just been really badly hurt and my first thought was to get a good snap of the fray. Moments later the traffic moved on and we left the horrible mess behind us.

I’ve thought about the crash a lot since then. It was one of those situations and one of those opportunities that (at least I hope) will never present its self again. I’m certain that I missed out on taking an amazing photograph. I probably could have sold it, at least to the local papers, and I would have received lashings of praise from my photographer friends. Regardless though, I’m sure I made the right decision. Sure, it could have been a great photo, but at what cost? All I could think while putting the camera down was what if it was me? How would I feel if someone else profited from my misfortune? I could never be proud of the photo; I would always feel a little ashamed.

It’s not quite the same thing, but I have a friend who is a freelance celebrity photographer. He’s one of those guys you see hanging over the railing at glitzy, red carpet events. In his view, the absolute best part of his job is when something goes wrong and he gets a good snap of the big name when it happens. It’s these photos that he’s most proud of and it’s these photos that earn him the most money. In life away from work he’s one of the nicest people you’ll ever meet. He’s kind, generous and a great guy to be around, which is why I can’t understand why he gets such a buzz from doing what he does. After all, isn’t it profiting from someone else’s misfortune in its purest form?

There are times when it is prudent and even important for us to photograph “bad things”. For instance, without the photographs and news reels of the two world wars, how would we know of the atrocities that occurred? It’s also important that we keep seeing them. Not every day, but at least every now and then. It’s imperative that we are reminded of these ‘horrors of war’. Can you imagine what would happen if we forgot? Without the photos of starving children in third world countries we would be unaware of the constant struggle of hundreds of millions of fellow human beings. They would have no voice and there would be no way for us to know that they need our help. It’s these photographs that remind us of how fortunate we really are and in doing so give us perspective on our own lives.

I don’t think the lessons we learn from seeing photos of car accidents are really on the same par. Sure, we are reminded of what happens if we don’t drive carefully, but then how many traffic accidents do you see in a year from simply driving about? That seems enough of a reminder to me. As for what we learn from seeing A-list celebrities tripping over at a movie premier – well I’m stumped.

Perhaps I’m making too big of a deal about all this? Maybe I’m just going soft, but this type of thing really doesn’t sit well with me.

What do you think about this? If you had been in that traffic jam what would you have done? Would you have taken the photo or would it not have even crossed your mind? Perhaps you would react as I did, fully intending to take the shot but then finding that you couldn’t follow through? Is there a line that should be drawn or is everything fair game?

March 18th 2008 |

2 Responses

  1. Greg Furry Says:

    I say take the shot. Good bad or indifferent you are documenting something that is important. What if your shot was used to lead investigators to figure out why the car crashed or why the car exploded. You may save future lives. My theory is always take the shot. You can always decide what to do with the shot after you have it on your camera. IF you never take the decision is already made for you.

  2. Charlie Says:

    I hadn’t thought about it like that. From that angle you could almost argue that it was wrong not to take the shot. I particularly like your point that you can decide what to do after you have taken the shot. Those are probably good words to live by. I wonder how many amazing shots have been missed because the photographer deliberated for too long before pushing the button?

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.